Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ess'mode par Irene Major


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 07:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Ess&

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Promotional (created by COI editor). Show not in English, aired in England, or culturally significant to justify a page on en.wiki Very poor article, completely unreferenced. Speedy nomination removed by creator so taken to AfD for independent judgement. Rayman60 (talk) 22:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC) *
 * Delete Just want to say,, that a show does not have to be in English or aired in England to meet Wikipedia's criteria. This is the English-language version of Wikipedia, not the Wikipedia about English-related topics.  That said, I cannot find any Reliable, independent sources about this show. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: True. In absence of definitive TV show notability criteria, other ways of assessing it should be employed, hence the 'culturally significant' consideration. I looked at parallels to Notability (films) as well as general criteria and it was considerably short of both. If it was something like the original Dutch version of Big Brother, that would most likely go unchallenged, however the line is drawn somewhere to prevent this from becoming an IMDB-esque global database for all TV and subsequently any media hence my nomination. Rayman60 (talk) 20:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.