Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ess Vee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Ess Vee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 04:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 15.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  05:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Theassocmg (talk) 22:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The link in the article to The Source (magazine) doesn't work. Searching there I see only a brief mention and link to their video.  Any significant coverage in reliable sources out there?   D r e a m Focus  00:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The article was created by someone representing the band. They admitted that when they requested help.  As I asked on their talk page, has this band been interviewed or reviewed anywhere in a printed magazine or newspaper or on a broadcast radio or television show?   D r e a m Focus  01:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - I think Dream Focus found everything I was able to find. I think given what is out there, this may well be a case of WP:TOOSOON. I'd have no problem with userfication but I'd be concerned about someone with an obvious COI babysitting this until they thought it was ready. Happy to consider alternate suggestions but I don't think this should be in mainspace right now. Stalwart 111  23:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  08:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - As per essay WP:TOOSOON, the article fails pretty much every criteria. Eduemoni<sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓ </b> 20:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.