Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essence (2010 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Essence (2010 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

From my original prod: I can find no references for this film. If it's still in production, it fails WP:NFF and should not have an article.

From Noq's prod2: Appears to be a hoax. Image has been badly photoshopped to change the film title from something like "... of death". Article creator loaded the image and claimed it as their own work and released under creative commons - unlikely for a movie poster. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 20:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and my prod2 rationale. IP user that removed the prod also removed a speedy tag from another article created by the same editor as this article. noq (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found zero sources. Most likely a hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any sources (although this may be due to the nature of the title). Fails WP:N if not WP:NFF. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable, and send that image up for FfD. This smells of a hoax; but any sources that may exist are well-hidden with this title. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per the nomination statement and comments by Noq, unnotable film that absolutely stinks of a hoax. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - probably WP:HOAX. Nothing I can find on Google news.  Either way, doesn't seem verifiable or to have received significant coverage.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  01:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.