Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essential Brides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 04:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Essential Brides
Tagged as a speedy, which it is not iMO. But it does look like promotion (although i edited out the more glaring ad text, and munged the links) and it is probably non-notable. But if it really is the first such buisness in all of Australia (and if this can be verified, it just might be notable. Delete unless verifiable evidence of notability added to the article. DES (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that it does not meet CSD though. --CastAStone 01:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   07:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. utcursch | talk 11:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Is this chain a market leader down under? Qaz  ( talk ) 04:49, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dottore So 05:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.