Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essex primary school


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to London Borough of Newham. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 00:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Essex primary school

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nonnotable primary school. Edison (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Newham as per standard procedure for primary schools. Uncontroversial process, no need for an AfD debate. --Kudpung (talk) 00:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - creator has been blocked indef for vandalism - probably for creation of inappropriate new pages. --Kudpung (talk) 00:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect, preferably with a better description than "middle-sex pupils". It might be that the school only takes pupils from the former country of Middlesex, or only takes pupils who are transgendered or hermaphrodites, but I don't think that's what they meant. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect, now my eyes have recovered from probably one of the most badly designed websites I've ever seen. Having said that, this is a huge primary school at 900+ pupils, and so it is possible that it may be possible to write an article on it - this isn't it though. Black Kite (t) (c) 12:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge -- the consensus is that we do not have articles on primary schools. The target should be the place where it is.  900 pupils makes it a large school, but hardly exceptional.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.