Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esso Station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. A separate discussion can be held regarding the article's title, but the consensus to keep is clear. Complex / Rational 20:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Esso Station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An article about a single gas station in Piggott, Arkansas, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, which was torn down "sometime after 2013". It seems like a good addition to the article on the town, but I don't think it merits its own article.

Incidentally, even if the article is kept, "Esso Station" isn't a good title. There's a lot of Esso stations out there.

Ormewood (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep In general, things listed on the NRHP are considered notable by default and there exists at some coverage of it outside of just the NRHP filing. See Arkansas listings in the National Register of Historic Places, Latimer, Franklin Allen, Arkansas Historical Quarterly, Summ 2002, Vol. 61, Issue 2. It has several sentences of historical details and a pull photo of it, in particular . And being torn down doesn't really change anything since notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY. For the name, there's no other full article with that base name. But changing this to a disambiguation page with links to this and other Esso stations that are under other names may make sense once this AFD is resolved (either boldly or through a WP:REQUESTEDMOVE.) Skynxnex (talk) 20:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep agree with Skynxnex, a future merge may work, but the article on the town is a bit of a hodgepodge and needs some organizatio, so I think for the moment a merge would not improve the state of the encyclopedia for readers seeking knowledge. &mdash;siro&chi;o 22:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep with title change. Agree with Ormewood that the title is useless, but Skynxnex is right about NRHP subjects. Last1in (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.