Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estcoin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus for Keep, given that though it wasn't policy, the discussion of it was sufficient to provide notability. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 21:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Estcoin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was never an official plan according to CNBC Џ 12:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, though the article should be updated to reflect this. Even if turns out it was never an official Estonian Government policy, and was just the over-publicized brainchild of the director of their e-Residency program, it still remains notable per the extensive and continuing coverage it has received - continuing coverage that includes the article you have just provided. --  No COBOL  (talk) 12:59, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, per the above vote. WesSirius (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per . Passes notability per coverage. Balkywrest (talk) 10:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Marginal to delete - all the coverage is a single publicity push for a thing that doesn't exist. I'm entirely unconvinced anyone is going to come here to look for this thing - David Gerard (talk) 10:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete : does not meet WP:NSOFT / WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. The page creator is a probable sock; please see: Sockpuppet investigations/1-555-confide. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * What do you mean "significant RS coverage not found"? CNBC and CNN not good enough for you? also, sock's content was stricken out from history. Completely new article. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meritless nom's rationale. Yes it was a plan, but Eurobank killed it. It was a notable development for a small country. It definitely met WP:GNG in 2018. Notablity does not become outdated. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG, as per a source review, with significant coverage by Reuters, CNBC and Bloomberg. Furthermore, notability is not temporary. North America1000 09:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG Misterpottery (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.