Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esteemed Colleagues


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  03:49, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Esteemed Colleagues
Doesn't meet WP:WEB Esprit15d 22:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Deleteper nom.Obina 00:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable web forum. 136 registered users.  No alexa traffic rank.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 02:26Z 
 * Speedy delete as non-notable vanity. I treat cool and awesome as keywords meaning delete me. This author has used both! -- RHaworth 07:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Which criterion for speedy deletion do you feel that this meets? Stifle 16:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB Werdna648T/C\@ 10:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Quarl. Stifle 16:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.