Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estefan Gargost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per below, and Speedy per User Request. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Estefan Gargost

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Unreferenced, an unremarkable campaign worker, appears to be a vanity article. WWGB (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and WP:COI. CultureDrone (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Can anyone suggest what can be done to avoid deletion? The reasons given above seem immaterial.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EGGArgost (talk • contribs) 13:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - dropped a note on the users' talk page suggesting he read WP:AUTO. CultureDrone (talk) 13:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Given the content there now, I've tagged it for WP:CSD. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've had a talk with the author - he's requested the article be deleted, so I've changed the speedy to a G7 (author requests deletion) - a bit nit-picky, I know ! :-) CultureDrone (talk) 14:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.