Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esterel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Vacated. '''. Bad faith nomination by indefblocked user. causa sui (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:N entirely


 * Keep Quite a well-known language within its niche. The IEEE are even working on a standardised version. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Proof? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.9.214.53 (talk) 12:03, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Note Nominator FlyLanguage appears to be exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior related to his own page getting deleted. snaphat (talk) 12:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note, irrelevant, since this fails WP:N entirely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 13:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.