Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Okade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Esther Okade

 * – ( View AfD View log )

By and large this is a WP:BLP1E, just as it was when Power (now ) PROD'd it in 2019. The third reference, from The Nation, is identical to the CNN coverage from 2015 and indeed notes that it is "Culled from CNN.com", so it can be disregarded. The other two references are basically human-interest fluff, both from around the same time in 2015, and the Telegraph one is bylined to "Agency" - is it a press release?

There has been no new coverage of her since; every additional "article" I found on crappy blogazines was just repetition of the same information, sometimes with her age updated. For example, this 2019 article from the Nigerian Guardian is mostly info and large quotes from the 2015 CNN article, with zero new information, and in fact presents the story like it just happened despite the 4-year time gap.

Conclusion: two fluffy human-interest stories with zero new coverage are not sufficient to justify retaining a BLP article about a child whose life is otherwise a private matter. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and the BLP1E issue mentioned in my previous PROD; there's still nothing here. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 01:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — @ I couldn’t even access the Telegraph source it’s a WP:PAYWALL. I’m somewhat biased about this because I love chess and by default every chess lover loves maths and physics so that’s that for that but the WP:1E argument does indeed hold water. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON. I wish her all the best life has to offer and someday when she meets GNG an article on her would be retained on mainspace. Celestina007 (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you move extremely quickly, you can copy/paste the article into a word processor before the paywall notice actually pops up. That's what I did :) &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @, oh my! that worked. Celestina007 (talk) 23:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom WP:1E.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.