Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Petrack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to America's_Next_Top_Model,_Cycle_15. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Esther Petrack

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Individual whose only claim to notability is participation in a TV show, which is still in progress.  role player 19:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Individual who has influenced the Jewish community worldwide and whose actions have sparked conversations among all kinds of people, Jewish and non-Jewish. She is only a TV show contestant, fine, but she has done a lot more than model. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.8.163.1 (talk) 19:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 15, the series she is participating in. If her notability later becomes clearer, the redirect can be changed back into a proper article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to America's Next Top Model, Cycle 15. I agree with Metropolitan90 on this. The subject's name is a plausible search term and the info can be pulled out if notability is later established. Location (talk) 01:58, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * From Creator Do whatever you guys would like, but it would probably be a good idea to keep the text of the article for the off chance that her notability becomes important enough for her to have her own page. --Zipadeedooda91 (talk) 16:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, I see no significant coverage in reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete per Metropolitan90. WereWolf (talk) 04:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.