Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estonia–Thailand relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Estonia–Thailand relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non resident embassies. trade is very small. only minor bilateral agreements. http://www.mfa.ee/eng/kat_176/7687.html LibStar (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment -, , . Found those three sources, but I am not sure that is enough as they seem a bit trivial in nature. So probably leaning delete but not made up yet. -  Marcusmax ( speak ) 02:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of independent, in-depth coverage, which I couldn't find and is unlikely to exist. - Biruitorul Talk 03:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for the usual reasons. JJL (talk) 03:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No substantial trade, political history, religious connections, treaties, not much at all in common. Collect (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasoning at other random country combos... Yeah, we are going to have to do this over and over again--Unionhawk Talk 17:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unresearched, un-secondary-sourced, cookie-cutter stub that nevertheless apparently requires a non-cookie-cutter explanation of how each and every one of these fails WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:NOTDIR. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  22:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 11:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this unsourced stub of no established notability and none establishable by me since i fail to find any reliable sources that discuss this relationship in the depth to meet any of our notability guidelines. An additional list of non-notable unsourced content doesn't obviate the need to get rid of the unsourced, non-notable content at hand.Bali ultimate (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.