Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estonian Firefighting Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Estonian Firefighting Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORG. Marked for notability concerns 18 months ago. Even the Estonian version of this article is based on the museum's own website. LibStar (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:ORG being documented in detail in A Guide to the Museums of Tallinn. Andrew D. (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * if that's the best source you can find, hardly fits WP:SIGCOV. LibStar (talk) 11:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The source contains multiple pages about the topic and so easily passes WP:SIGCOV. Andrew D. (talk) 11:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

surprised you haven't pulled out the useless WP:PRESERVE argument. A museum guide is hardly third party. Has this museum been covered in third party sources ? LibStar (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep Found two articles in Estonian: using Google translate, the one from Eesti Päevaleht seems to be about the museum's relocation, the one from Postimees seems to be about their takeover of another museum. I'm not sure the translations are accurate so I'm only leaning keep right now. Altamel (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be the official museum of a national government agency and also situated in an historic building. That's good enough for notability as far as I'm concerned. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.