Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estrella Falls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  00:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Estrella Falls

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm aware of the general controversy/debate about the notability of malls but this one won't even open for another two years. No evidence of notability. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 22:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The fact that it won't open for a while seems to be immaterial. I did find this and this which seem to be decent sources. Also, given the sheer size of the mall (it's not just a mall actually; there will be residential space and a hotel), it's very likely to be even more notable when it opens. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have rewritten the page and added these refs. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL and notability issues RogueNinja talk  22:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's WP:CRYSTAL at all; several of the tenants have been verified in the two sources I dug up. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It might have notability in the future. Right now, it does not.   RogueNinja talk  23:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - This appears to be the subject of secondary sources and not WP:CRYSTAL as it is verified. --Oakshade (talk) 01:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If it opens, it can be considered for an article. That its opening has been delayed until two years hence suggests that it may never open. Mangoe (talk) 03:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems to have satisfied the "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" portion of WP:N. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  05:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.