Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estrellas del Aire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. with leave to restore at a later date in order to merge and redirect to the article on the parent company if/when that is created. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   03:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Estrellas del Aire

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication of notability. Just because it existed does not make it WP:Notable. Directories and pictures do not establish notability. Google search does not show anything other than directory and blog sites. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 08:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: probably notable, but I don't read Spanish. Here are the results of a Google News Archive search:  I'm not sure all of those hits are relevant, however. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Unclear to me how deleting this content would improve the encyclopedia. Freakshownerd (talk) 03:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment How does keeping an article that fails to meet WP:ORG improve the encyclopaedia? Removing articles that do not meet the minimum requirements for inclusion and seem unlikely to, will improve the overall quality of the information that remains. noq (talk) 11:23, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you sure it doesn't meet WP:ORG? -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 21:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have not seen anything so far that shows that it does - are you sure it does? noq (talk) 23:35, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It's obviously a notable piece of the airline history of Mexico. Whether it should be stand alone or merged somewhere is an editing decision, but deleting it out of existence in no way improves the encyclopedia. Freakshownerd (talk) 00:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If it is so obvious, where are the WP:reliable sources to WP:verify that? noq (talk) 06:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I added an FAA document. Freakshownerd (talk) 13:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You are verifying existence - not notability. Can you find anything that meets the guidelines at WP:ORG? noq (talk) 17:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - most sources on the page merely mention the airline, there is no discussion. The exception is here, which is a single paragraph of three sentences.  I don't think there is any question that the airline existed, but I don't think it is sufficiently notable to pass WP:N.  Coverage may be reliable, and independent, but is not extensive.  Without further sources, the page doesn't pass notability.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 15:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * A book source has been added that includes commentary about its history and a photo. Freakshownerd (talk) 01:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * merge with the article that needs to be made for  the parent company Estrellas del Oro, a significant bus company (using the info. from the figure caption in the book references added). As itself, a nonscheduled airline with a single plane isn't notable, and 1992 is much to late tto qualify as a pioneer.    DGG ( talk ) 02:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.