Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esurient Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 11:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Esurient Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG according to my searches in Google News and Google Books, all of which are just trivial mentions of the label. ProQuest has nothing at all. BNA has only one passing mention. Not one of the more important indie labels as per WP:NMUSIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies,  and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 10:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.