Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eswatini–Japan relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Eswatini–Japan relations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. There really is not much to these relations except diplomatic recognition. Eswatini has very little relations outside of Africa. LibStar (talk) 07:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Africa,  and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of diplomatic missions in Eswatini. HenryTemplo (talk) 09:41, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Japan has no diplomatic mission in Eswatini. So it doesn't seem logical to merge there. LibStar (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That makes me question why this article was started in the first place! However, this makes me think that Japan had/has a diplomatic mission of some description in Eswatini (But it is based in South Africa), thus the merge. However, I feel a Redirect may be more appropriate in light of this. HenryTemplo (talk) 06:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. All relevant content is already covered in Foreign relations of Eswatini. It also seems like another article of this nature was deleted via AfD, discussion here.  ~XyNq tc 16:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  This AfD discussion includes a proposal for merger to List of diplomatic missions in Eswatini,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and a notice of the proposed merger was posted to on June 22. As such, this AfD discussion may need to be extended or relisted to incorporate input from.


 * Delete. Nothing to merge. Yilloslime (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is so obscure, there's nothing that really discusses the subject. Fails GNG. Jacona (talk) 10:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.