Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eta Phi Zeta (sorority)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Eta Phi Zeta (sorority)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While I'm usually reluctant to delete articles about fraternities or sororities that exist at multiple universities, this article has zero sources, and I can't find any reliable independent sources myself, so it's not clear that the subject is considered notable under WP:ORG. I have taken into consideration the fact that this sorority is active only in Puerto Rico and have searched for sources using the search term "sororidad" in place of "sorority" along with "Eta Phi Zeta", but I have still only found references in social media at best. Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No significant coverage found. Fails GNG and ORG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Allison (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per DEL8 for lack of notability under the relevant guidelines (GNG or ORG). I couldn't find anything, even trivial coverage in questionable sources (discounting unquestionably unreliable social media sources). The closest I came up with was a document commemorating the fortieth anniversary of a Eta Phi Zeta in North Carolina, but that appears to be unrelated. Rebb  ing  20:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.