Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eta Phi Zeta (sorority) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Eta Phi Zeta (sorority)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted at Articles for deletion/Eta Phi Zeta (sorority). A recent CSD-Repost was declined, but this is nevertheless a resurrection, if not a direct copy, of the original article and it still fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find any information indicating that it meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Maybe a Spanish speaker could, but I cannot. Knox490 (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 (c)  00:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- yes, please. This is a fan page & such content belongs on the org's web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - I've gone through and added some secondary references, most specifically to "Brothers and Sisters: Diversity in College Fraternities and Sororities", for which the section that mentions them is on google books. I've also deleted the links to the greek letters and the golden chapter. I'll add when I can information on the indicident that happened at UPR-Utuado http://corp.primerahora.com/archivo.asp?guid=38F3213875EC4BDD9750CDBB0FD1D0B2&year=2004&keyword= and http://corp.primerahora.com/archivo.asp?guid=BA1FA9171198495A943E2DA30B638CFC&year=2005&keyword= )Naraht (talk) 18:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm surprised we have no N criteria for frats.  d.g. L3X1  (distant write)  18:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I sort of have one. As one component, if the total number of years active for the chapters > 50 it is notable (so for a random group: Alpha's been active for 27 years, Beta for 20 and Gamma for 4 meets it) I think Eta Phi Zeta meets that as well. It was easier for groups that existed prior to 1991. If they were in Baird's, they passed. Naraht (talk) 12:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, was not notable before, and still fails to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.