Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etang de la Montoie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cornol. Additionally merge from history as may be required.  Sandstein  09:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Etang de la Montoie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. It has been tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. It's possibly worth a merge to Cornol, where it is not currently mentioned. Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge into Cornol, retaining title as a redirect. A pond of 1.4 ha is a fair size, although probably not big enough to justify a stand-alone article per WP:GEOLAND. Mjroots (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  01:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete/merge into Cornol per above. I hope my recent edits to Cornol are enough that the closer can simply delete the article. On a pedantic note, it is not "Etang de la Montoie" but "Étang de la Montoie" since the word étang is accentuated and proper French typography has accentuated capital letters (even if it is hardly ever done nowadays because the dominant keyboard layout is a very poor adaptation of qwerty). Tigraan (talk) 13:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, and of course redirects are cheap. Tigraan (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.