Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etel Leit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Etel Leit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. The sources given are either not significantly about the article subject, not independent, or not reliable and my attempts to find better sources that establish notability have come up pretty empty. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep No reason to delete this article. Etel Leit is a well-known TV personality who has authored books and created music CDs on a subject that has attracted great interest among parents. She lectures on the topic and has been interviewed by NBC, CNN and so on. She was profiled in a university publication. In my opinion, the tone is neutral, not promotional.I have written nearly a hundred articles in the last decade and all have been found acceptable. As always on Wikipedia, there is room for improvement, but at the moment, I think deletion is unjustified.--Geewhiz (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not how we prove notability on Wikipedia. If you believe the subject is notable, you need to provide the evidence in the form of reliable third-party sources that focus specifically on this person, rather than simply mention her in passing. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 13:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 13:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I did a WP:BEFORE and came up empty. Wikipedia is not for promotion. Wm335td (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't know what you guys are talking about. This article is backed up by a series of references that specifically relate to Etel Leit, not just a "passing mention." Seems like you are just serial deletionists and haven't even looked at the article. She is a woman who is dedicated to improving communication and has been covered by third party sources. There are efforts going on to improve Wikipedia coverage of women, and this article fits in that category. Certainly it has more going for it than a very large percentage of entries about superheroes and space creatures or whatever else interests the teenagers who make up the bulk of Wiki editors nowadays...--Geewhiz (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Come now. That is a borderline WP:PA. Not a teenager here either. Please refrain. You can check anyone's AfD !voting record here. I will WP:AGF and if you can show me two non-trivial secondary sources I will change my !vote. I did not find any. Wm335td (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete A WP:BEFORE search didn't turn up anything establishing notability and the article itself is clearly written in a promotional tone. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I looked to be sure, and found zero sources on google newspapers, scholar, or JSTOR. That's not just lack of significant coverage, that's no coverage. I found Leit's books on Google Books, along with passing mentions and even "No results found in this book." This may be the first time I've been accused of being a "deletionist" in my 12 years of service to Wikipedia. Bearian (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.