Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 18:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Eternal (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable business organization. Binksternet (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 17:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I have no idea why someone think the company is non-notable. The company basically served the Greater China region, so it's normal that foreign people don't know it. However, it's doesn't mean that the company is not notable. The other pages named "Eternal" on Wikipedia are also non-notable to me, but people including me should keep neutral and objective because of the limited knowledge. Leehsiao (talk) 01:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Serving a large region does not make a company notable. Please see Notability (organizations and companies) to get a sense of what needs to be done here. Binksternet (talk) 05:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete If there are sources in Chinese then they need to be provided. Source #1 on the article is a dead link; sources 2 & 3 do not mention the company but are about Jolin Tsai, not the company. LaMona (talk) 03:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect or merge to its parent company, Era Television. There are just not enough in depth sources in English to justify its own article. Bearian (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.