Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Grace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Divine grace. And delete first.  Sandstein  06:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Eternal Grace

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:SPAM, created by banned account. But if the tiny church magazines it cites count as RS, then perhaps it meets N, and just needs a serious scrubbing and watchful eye (beyond the anon IP editor removing tags). THF (talk) 08:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @974  · 22:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Find a reason to do it.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 09:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of this is significant coverage - the church is only mentioned in passing in relation to Richard Rossi, who does seem to be notable. Half the links are dead, and I can't find anything about it on either the http://www.charismamag.com or the http://www.house2house.com websites, both of which were mentioned. StAnselm (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would normally have suggested Merge with the place where the church is located, but it is far from clear precisely where that is, apart from its seeking to attract Hollywood actors. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Richard Rossi. This church doesn't really seem notable in its own right - the sources provided focus on the founder instead, so it should be merged into his article. Robofish (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No need to merge, those things which are worth saying are in the Richard Rossi article, and a redirect there for as common a Christian phrase as this would be inappropriate. Redirect to Divine grace. --Bejnar (talk) 04:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course. Good point. I'd second that. StAnselm (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.