Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Hayden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mr. Peter Hayden. If more sources come to light, I would not be opposed to the redirect being reverted and the article expanded to incorporate them. But, with that said, there are simply not enough notable search results in the brief Google search that I did at this time. I concur with the conclusions that both the nominator and MassiveYR came to. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Eternal Hayden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Altho there are refs, flaky is the word I would use to describe them. I actually favour redirecting to the band's page, which is what I did when I encountered the article. But (what a surprise0 article creator reverted. Seeking a broader consensus. TheLongTone (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  10:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  10:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect as per nom. I couldn't find sufficient coverage for this release to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM.  gongshow  talk  03:28, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 03:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.