Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete (non-admin closure). IRWolfie- (talk) 21:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Eternal energy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non notable fringe theory with only a facebook page as reference. noq (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Blatant copy-and-paste from the Facebook page. (Duplication detector) I would have tagged it for CSD G12. Needless to say this is non-notable original research. Google Books and Google Scholar turned up nothing for "Keyvan Shadafza". The article seems to have been created by an SPA (User:Eternal-keyvan), possibly Shadafza himself. Braincricket (talk) 13:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The above topic "Eternal Energy" is a theory proposed by Iranian national MR Keyvan Shadafza. The term "eternal energy" is widely used, e.g., Eternal Energy Corp, "Eternal Energies" by Sandya Shetty. However, Eternal Energy by Shadafza is not among those eternal energy term usages in reliable sources. Deleted since fails WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:13, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Article contains no references, and the subject is a post-graduate student's theory that he hasn't even given a name to yet. When the theory gets a name and is published in a respectable peer-reviewed journal, it could attain notability in the future. DOSGuy (talk) 17:37, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete this is pretty uncontroversial so I'm really just adding to the WP:SNOW.--Talain (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, appears to fail our notability criteria. Cavarrone (talk) 07:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete It's a copyright violation. Someone want to put it up for speedy delete? IRWolfie- (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and tagged it for speedy. IRWolfie- (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.