Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternity Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-01 04:09Z 

Eternity Theory

 * — (View AfD)

Reads like an essay--not encyclopedic. I can't find any reference to an "Eternity Theory". Glendoremus 06:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Without references, it seems like Original Research to me. And the claim that Agnostics "support" this theory is dubious too. =Axlq 07:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 08:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. To quote from the article, "no evidence exists to support this concept".  Indeed.  Serpent&#39;s Choice 08:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original Research.  Possible hoax.  Spinach Dip 10:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Full of flawed logic.  If justification for an article is that "no evidence exists to support this concept, (but) believers argue that there is no evidence to disprove it" then we are in serious trouble.  Emeraude 13:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete OR essay. TSO1D 16:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I suspect that the idea of so-called eternity theory is discussed elsewhere on Wikipedia. (Try cosmology.)  129.98.212.73 18:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's found at Steady state theory. The idea is completely discredited since Penzias and Wilson. Delete -- Bpmullins | Talk 23:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources given despite request. Gazpacho 06:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.