Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EthanGamer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

EthanGamer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

very poorly sourced article about a minor, seems to be an up and coming youtuber but otherwise lacking in required coverage for a blp. Praxidicae (talk) 15:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DannyS712 (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete: I'm finding a *bunch* of passing mentions, but I'm just not finding that much which passes muster at WP:GNG. Sources that I found are listed below.  Nomader  ( talk ) 16:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Tech Times, 6-Year-Old South Korean YouTuber Boram Buys $8 Million Property In Seoul : Passing mention for being a YouTuber who earns a bunch of money.
 * South China Morning Post, Coco, Ethan Gamer, Taytum and Oakley, Hyun-ho, Gabe and Garrett – which kid influencers will find fame as adults?: Has a section dedicated to Ethan Gamer and interviewing him, but it's not exactly major or explaining of notability.
 * Manchester Evening News, Even more Minecraft megastars to take centre stage at Manchester's Digital Kids Show : Passing mention which describes Ethan Gamer as one of the Minecraft "megastars"
 * Manchester Evening News, Digital Kids Show under fire from parents who say it 'wasn't what was promised' : Talks about how Ethan Gamer did a great job at a terrible event (IMO kind of an entertaining article to read but doesn't establish notability)
 * Mediated Interfaces: The Body on Social Media : The book has a pretty long section about how Ethan interacts with folks on his channel.
 * Delete As per norm. Fails WP:GNG.  D My Son  02:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete we need way, way, way, way better sourcing to justify having an article on a 13-year-old.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources aren’t good enough. SK2242 (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.