Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Ash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Ethan Ash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability shown through significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:25, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I have taken out the references that I added in to this page that I imagine are not in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. Please review Chezmcgee (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - The news stories I found of Ethan Ash were 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 910, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 He does not appear to be a very popular singer, but there is defiantly some notability in Ethan Ash looking at the sources I provided. Perhaps once he becomes more famous and has more notability than he currently does, then I would support having an article about him. Until then, it seems he does not have enough notability to have an article on Wikipedia. Andise1 (talk) 02:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Popularity is subjective. Using that as an argument, there are countless artists on here who should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.221.56.57 (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't an acceptable argument. Popularity (or rather notability) has to be proved, something that I don't think has been done here. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 14:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.