Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Conrad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —  Newslinger  talk   04:10, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Ethan Conrad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be a property developer in the Sacramento area, and outside of small pieces in local Sacramento trade magazines (e.g. here), there is little other RS on him for GNG. Almost no RS outside of Sacramento (i.e. no regional or national notability). Strangely, this article, and his company article Ethan Conrad Properties, were created within a day of each other (13-14 November 2019) by two different editors who didn't link them (and the author of the BLP is a new largely SPA, who after a few random edits, dropped this BLP in one go); so we could have a UPE/SPI issue here too. I leave it to the community to decide. Britishfinance (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Britishfinance (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Britishfinance (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable property developer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Does not have nobility outside his local town. Nika2020 (talk) 14:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ANYBIO - coverage is entirely local. We are a charity, not a free resume service. A search of news articles outside of his home town reveals zero articles about him and his company. To paraphrase Elizabeth Warren, "He's made some money, good for him." I've appeared several times in interviews in my local BizJournals, but I'm making no claim that I'm notable. My full resume is at LinkedIn, where his belongs, too. Bearian (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. No SIGCOV, clearly fails GNG as non-notable businessperson. PK650 (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per others. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    22:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject of the article clearly fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not for promotional piece.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 01:48, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.