Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Millener


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. I think we've reached consensus here. -- Steel 01:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Ethan Millener
Vanity article for a high school student whose assertion of notability is that he was in the local paper and made an independent film. Neither assertion meets WP:BIO, but it can no longer be speedied. -- Merope Talk 00:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable in the least. --AlbertHerring 00:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Propose closing AfD per WP:SNOW, and blocking user for repeatedly creating the same page and new page with alternate spelling under WP:Vandalism after appropriate warnings. Leuko 00:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Not notable indeed in any sense. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites) 01:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, possibly even Speedy (though I guess it's arguable that having made a film is at least a claim to notability). Fails WP:BIO by miles.  Hint to future vanity-article writers: when you have to pad out your article with a list of classes you're taking in high school, it's a pretty bad sign. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and protect G4 and A7.-- Hús  ö  nd  01:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Anybody with a camcorder can make an independant film, so that doesn't really help him. TJ Spyke 01:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.