Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ether Warriors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete --Gareth Hughes 15:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Ether Warriors
NN. Does not currently exist. WP is not a crystal ball. Jwissick (t)  (c)  19:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC) What on earth!? How dare you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pet 350 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. per nom--Esprit15d 19:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. The author Pet 350 just strengthened the case for this deletion by blanking this AfD section. --Lockley 20:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, the notability of this series of computer games is not demonstrated in the article, plus there are no verifiable sources, and probable vanity issues. Unfortunately I can see no applicable speedy criterion. Sliggy 20:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

This is ridiculous - the series of games DO exist with the hyper link provided www.geocities.com/etherwarriors, where downloads are AVAILABLE. Deleting this article would just show what a lot of pompous, incomprehensible cretins of admins you are. This article by my knowledge is superflous to criteria requirements! You absolute blatherskytes.--62.30.195.121 21:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The preceding unsigned comment was added by Captain Haddock from the Tintin comics, based on the tone and language used. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article only says the thing is in production. Ruby 21:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for the obvious reasons above, and in the hope that I'll be called a "blatherskyte"--Bugturd 22:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasoning outlined by Sliggy, and also bad behaviour by the article creator during an AfD is seldom a good sign. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.