Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethical Threads


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 17:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Ethical Threads

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - there are some sources: LA Times is kind of a passing mention, NYTimes discusses the company more. Also mentioned in New Statesman (again, slightly passing), The Guardian (and again), and in a 2007 article in the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JSTOR). —Tom Morris (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I've also found some different sources which provide extra info, which I've added to article. Rwendland (talk) 15:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.