Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethics of Cloning: Human reproductive cloning from Shia view point


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Ethics of Cloning: Human reproductive cloning from Shia view point

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was prod'ded with the rationale "No evidence found of notability (for the book as well as the author) per WP:NBOOK, WP:GNG, or WP:ACADEMIC. " Article creator has been blocked for sockpuppetry, and many of their articles are up for deletion for a variety of reasons. Best to check this one as well. Fram (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam, Science,  and Iran. Fram (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Lambert Academic Publishing is a self publishing operator. This book is indeed not notable and its author likewise. Fails WP:GNG in spades. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional article by a non-reliable publisher. Oaktree b (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable author and not notable publisher. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nom. CT55555 (talk) 17:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per all the above. --StellarNerd (talk) 16:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.