Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethnicity of Viet Nam Fatalities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 03:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Ethnicity of Viet Nam Fatalities
Rambling, marginally comprehensible, problems with tone (frequent use of "I think"), problems with NPOV. Looks like a chunk of someone's paper, cut and paste without context. Might also be interpreted as containing ethnic slurs, although the prose is so convoluted I couldn't quite decide. Delete, unless someone's willing to do a massive cleanup - Csari 04:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Not at all clear why it is relevant to anything at all. At best should have some elements merged into various other articles on the Vietnam war. JoshuaZ 05:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it looks like an essay and sounds like an essay... --Kinu 05:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd say it wasn't much of an essay. --  stillnotelf   has a talk page  05:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. This essay isn't relevant to anything (not even to its own title!) Completely worthless crap. Grandmasterka 05:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I didn't find much I would consider merging anywhere else --Krich (talk) 07:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Deleteper above Prodego  talk  15:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is this some school essay? I really couldn't be bothered reading it after the second line, it's terrible. Nothing to clean up here. Average Earthman 15:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment (by nominator) - if it is a school essay, I suspect it failed! Csari 20:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's so badly-written I couldn't go past the first couple of lines. -- Mithent 22:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as mess.Blnguyen 05:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nomination. It's downright painful to read.  Maybe, theoretically, it could be cleaned up into something useful on the subject, but it would involve such a massive rewrite as to totally junk the article and start anew.  --Wingsandsword 09:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above.--み使い Mitsukai 01:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.