Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etihad Liberal Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Etihad Liberal Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not-Notable. can't find sources. Greek Legend (talk) 01:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    22:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    22:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as it is newly founded with no better convincing signs of solid notability thus questionable. SwisterTwister   talk  01:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SST flyer 00:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The entirety of the references are to Etihad's own "blogspot". All of them. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. No 3rd part reliable sources. Edwardx (talk) 13:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.