Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Etix

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

References on the page and in a WP:BEFORE do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Some announcements, CEO interviews, etc., but nothing significant. CNMall41 (talk) 07:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and North Carolina. Shellwood (talk) 10:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Originally a WP:SPA article, which raised concerns still visible on the Talk page. Searches confirm this as a company going about its business, dealing with event ticketing, but I am not seeing evidence of attained notability. (Also worth distinguishing the distinct Etix Everywhere data management company.) AllyD (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sources on page are either self-published or carry little to no mention of the company itself, can't find anything significant online. Tollens (talk) 07:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Mentions of a data centre, the CEO returning and the like, it's all PR stuff that's found in Gsearch. Nothing we can use for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.