Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etna software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone is prepared to write an article on Etna software that uses reliable sources, then feel free to set it up in a sandbox and list it at Deletion review. Otherwise, it stays deleted. Spebi (talk) 05:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Etna software

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

After extensive searching in both English and Russian languages, sources can't be found which would establish notability of this Russian company, thereby it fails WP:CORP Россавиа Диалог 20:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.   -- Россавиа Диалог 20:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Россавиа Диалог 20:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Unsourced article about a non-consumer software business. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:COMPANY -- Shark face  217  03:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. if more reliable references are added.    Dwilso  03:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as this article has no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability, and as a consequence, reads like an advertorial. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, vaguely promotional in tone. Wouldn't be a problem if reliable secondary sources were available which mark this company as being noteworthy or remarkable in some fashion, but I was not able to find any.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.