Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etranger di Costarica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Etranger di Costarica

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The cited sources are store opening announcement (WP:ROUTINE), Interview and company website. Searches in English and Japanese only found promotional pieces or trivial mentions, does not seem to pass WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Japan. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment. If this was purely on English sources it would be a delete, but I cannot vouch for Japanese sources? Not sure how to solve this, but feels like it is only a few stores. Aszx5000 (talk) 20:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, there seems to be nothing WP:SIGCOV about the place mentioned. The first source is just a description of the place and what it sells, and the second source is an interview with one of the staff of the shop, which would not be an independent source per WP:GNG. The third source is just a directory of places. Tirishan (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks indepth sources,fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.