Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euan G. Cameron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --Core desat 04:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Euan G. Cameron

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

hoax RepriseRubric 16:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. No such person listed at that institution. And even if so, no asserted notability. DMacks 17:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment There seems to be a real author named Euan Cameron out there who is somewhat notable, but there is no verification to link the real one to this. Wl219 17:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Article doesn't assert that subject currently works at said institution, most institutions don't list former faculty. Also this seems to show authorship. Smashville 17:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Smashville's link. This user has nominated a number of non-hoaxes recently. --Djsasso 17:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Amazon link provided by Smashville above shows he is a writer of more than a few books. This is clearly not a WP:HOAX. --Evb-wiki 17:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Changing my !vote to Keep, per Evb-wiki et al. Need to figure out more details about this person's affiliation, but academic details other than that do point to a real person who sounds WP:N. DMacks 18:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 23:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously not a very good article, but there was no reason to treat as hoax. In general I'd say that the authors of volumes in a major  widely used advanced textbook series  are selected on their basis of being recognized authorities. DGG (talk) 02:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.