Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eudiometer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator, without dissent. Non-admin closure. Serpent&#39;s Choice (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Eudiometer

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I am tagging this article for deletion for several reasons.

-There are four sources mentioned for 4 sentences among several hundred. It would be more work to find sources for these statements than to delete the page and start over methodically. -There are numerous formatting and spelling errors, which detract from the article. -Much of the information given is covered in other articles. This blatant overlap must be stopped.

Jokermole (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. No valid rationale for deletion - the fact that an article is in need of improvement is not a reason for deleting it.  I agree that it could do with more sources than simple dictionary definitions, but this is an historically important piece of apparatus that should have an article. Tevildo (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Tevildo above. None of the reasons given are part of deletion policy.  If it needs some work that's an editorial issue, not a deletion issue.--Cube lurker (talk) 23:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - there is no reason for deletion listed. We should fix problems, not remove articles that have them. matt91486 (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. The only thing I've got to add to the comments above is the word "speedy". Phil Bridger (talk) 11:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. per rationale above. Also, please note that User:Jokermole's first contribution (and only besides his/her own user/talkpages) is this AfD request.  May or may not be relevant, but it smells like xe's been wearing shoes too long on a hot day.   Keeper   |   76  21:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok guys. I understand your comments, and therefore believe that Keep is the best option. I am actually not a new user, but I have done my edits mostly anonymously from another ip. This account is NOT a sock puppet. Jokermole (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If you strike out the nomination and note that it's withdrawn it should get closed reasonably quickly.--Cube lurker (talk) 04:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.