Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugen Radescu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Eugen Radescu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing here indicates encyclopedic notability. I'm sure the subject is an interesting guy, but nothing he's done seems to qualify him for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Moreover, there are no sources establishing any sort of notability. - Biruitorul Talk 03:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable academic who comes no where near any notability criteria for an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   05:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Two cites on GS. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as I'm not finding anything at all actually convincing, started by an SPA in 2009. SwisterTwister   talk  07:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * comment not clear to me that he is an academic, a philosopher, or politics-related. Looks like some sort of artist, WP:CREATIVE, because interviews like this:  also, and .  Looks as though he's been curtaor/director, or co-director of the Bucharest Biennale since it began; his Little magazine becomes the journal of the Biennale every other year (according to the link I put in this comment to the Biennale Foundation). I did add an article from Artforum to the article.  I think someone who edits cutting edge art should take a look at this one.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. Doesn't seem to meet the SNG for scholars. Journalists are notoriously hard to source out, not seeing sufficient career achievement to push an IAR case on that basis. Carrite (talk) 18:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.