Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Krizek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Eugene Krizek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Asides the WP:COI with the article creator and article subject, I just cannot see subject of article having in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree - fails WP:GNG. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Was not finished adding sources to article- added 9 new sources today. Emarias22 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment While I appreciate the addition of more references, the subject still does not meet the general notability guidelines, as none of the references cited meet all three criteria: significant coverage, reliable sources, and independent of the subject:
 * U.S. Census: Not significant coverage
 * Classmates.com: Neither reliable nor significant
 * Congressional record (both House and Senate versions): Not significant coverage
 * Library of Congress interview: Not significant coverage
 * Runner's World: Not significant coverage
 * Asian American Press: Not independent (it's a press release)
 * Mount Vernon Gazette: The closest of all provided sources to meeting the criteria, but it's only a local newspaper
 * Christian Relief Services: Not independent
 * My search has not uncovered any better sources either. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete The Mount Vernon Gazette is a very local paper, and even if we could ignore that one source does not pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep there is coverage of his accomplishments in major newspapers .NotButtigieg (talk) 07:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment While he is mentioned in these article, they are not actually about him - they only mention him in relation to Billy Mills. Jmertel23 (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - the only reliable source is about somebody he mentored, Billy Mills. Bearian (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG per the analysis above. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jmertel23's analysis of references. Fails GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG he has founded a notable organization, and has served on several government positions, including one appointed by the Kennedy administration.Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.