Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugenix hair sciences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Eugenix hair sciences

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. No indication of importance. Brochure, native advertising article. Fails WP:SIGCOV.  scope_creep Talk  03:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Current sources are: press release, routine promotional piece, interview, promo routine announcement, another routine coverage, and interview-like press release with "offerings", "spotlight", and "client talks". These are obviously non-SIGCOV and fails WP:CORPDEPTH. A WP:BEFORE search found low-quality routine announcements, interviews, and mentions, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, but none of these satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH with numerous being non-independent interviews or press releases in dubiously RS sources.  VickKiang  (talk)  03:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I nominated this for deletion and it was deleted then recreated. On the outside looking in we have a COI editor deletion may need to be salted. Unbroken Chain (talk) 03:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Promotional article about a non-notable company. Onel 5969  TT me 12:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Editor has been blocked as UPE.   scope_creep Talk  12:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Promotional article. Contributor008 (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: the topic does not pass WP:NCORP. –– FormalDude  (talk)  02:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.