Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eureka Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. No assertion of notability, no verifiable sources available. WilliamH (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Eureka Mall

 * – ( View AfD View log )

same as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayshore_Mall Bihco (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. While the nominator's claim was true at the time s/he prodded the article, it was not true at the time s/he made this nomination . I am willing to retract this !vote if the nominator still wishes to pursue deletion on notability grounds. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 22:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC) Withdrawn because TPH presented a different argument for deletion. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 04:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources found, but to be fair, it was torn down in 1985 so I doubt too much is verifiable. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim to notability (surely there is no guideline claiming that all shopping malls are notable?). Appears to be a very ordinary mall with no references available apart from map locations and inconsequential links like this. Johnuniq (talk) 09:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Eureka Mall is still in business in 2011, but it is an inconsequential strip mall anchored by WinCo Foods, Staples, Michaels and so on. I spent an hour trying to find citions for it, and only came up with one story that it was evacuated for Carbon Monoxide fumes.  I don't think its notable and I've shopped there.  Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Current article content doesn't make any real case for notability.  If it turns out this was originally developed by Homart Development Company, please add to the table there.--Milowent • hasspoken  19:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.