Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eureka Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I would really feel silly saying "no consensus" here because nobody is saying "delete" but the two "keep" !voters are really not sure. The idea of redirecting makes sense but let's give the article's creator a little time to "show us the money" and we can then revisit this issue in a month or so which is the customary waiting time for a standard "no consensus" close anyway. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Eureka Media

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was deproded without addressing the concern. It still appears to fail WP:COMPANY. I am unable to find substantial reliable source references in secondary sources to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Temporary keep The article is very new and it appears that wp:notability is possible for the subject.  Give the editors a few months to put sourcing in to establish wp:notability.  North8000 (talk) 17:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I've added references for "Stone Silence" as an award-winning documentary. However, is that sufficient for the production company's notability? AllyD (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I'd feel more confident in voting keep if this had an article on Polish Wikipedia. I do think that the director and owner, Krzysztof Kopczyński is notable. Some if not all of the productions, same. But the company... hmmm. Probably, as the organization behind dozens of documentaries? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 20:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP since I cannot find "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" about the company. The company's relationship with Stone Silence and the director does not count because WP:CORP says, "An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. If the organization itself did not receive notice, then the organization is not notable." I am willing to change my mind if significant coverage can be provided. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 18:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to director's article is fine since it is a plausible search term. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Krzysztof Kopczyński where this production company is already spoken of in context to the filmmaker/founder.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.