Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro-English


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Euro-English

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Totally unreferenced, and useless: any salvageable content might be merged into European English A. di M. (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge the equivalent Eurospeak to European English. Eurospeak is at least sourced. Ddawkins73 (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as original research. A related article, English as a lingua franca for Europe, was deleted almost a year ago.  I'm  Jack (Lumber) and I approve this message. 01:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as patent nonsense: "Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever." And to be excruciatingly fair, one might find material for an article on English imperfectly acquired by Europeans, but I don't know quite what such a sociolinguistic phenomenon would be called, nor whether it has any significance in the world of linguistic research. And, in any event, this article ain't it.  J L G 4 1 0 4  02:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.