Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro-pro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:04, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Euro-pro

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Sources that are not cited for the article may have the article suspected as Advertisement which violates WP:SOAP. Bumblezellio (talk) 10:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. I haven't looked at it enough to vote, but it does seem to be a real company--2010 revenues of $719 million per Inc. (magazine) entry here. If kept, it will need a rewrite, but it's surely not a professional attempt at advertising, and the bits of marketing phrases that have been slapped in can be cleaned up. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. While the article is rather unclear as to what this business does, they seem to be selling appliances.  Making money in business is well and good, and I hope they do; but I don't see any evidence in either the article or a more specific search that suggests that this business has done anything that would get it into an encyclopedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete About as vague as you can get; the company indeed mainly sells floor care products such as steam cleaners and vacuum cleaners mainly through paid programming, but other than that, this form of the article is so unclear about what they do the only course outside of the few sources found and deletion is a complete stub rewrite.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as being a poor attempt at obfuscating spam. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.