Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euronaivism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Euronaivism
The word seems to have been made up by the author. A Google search for pages in English yields only 67 hits. All of those are either exact copies of the article (complete with merge proposal), or just a nonsensical, dead-end list of words with no independent meaning. Virtually every sentence and clause in the article starts speculatively with may or if, and it is merely called a possible caricature. At minimum, the lack of any other use on the internet means it is non-notable and non-verifiable. It's just not a real word used by anyone else. OneVeryBadMan 14:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV-pushing neologism. Smerdis of Tlön 15:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Dionyseus 16:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Richhoncho 19:09, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO Danny Lilithborne 01:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete naïve. Shreevatsa 12:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.