Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europe's 100 most infuential


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-09 08:41Z 

Europe's 100 most infuential

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable, WP:WEB, internet voting with 14 voters after three weeks Jklamo 02:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - reasons cited in nomination, no external coverage, and an Alexa ranking of 4,162,627 doesn't bode well for its notability. Crystallina 02:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Josh Parris
 * Delete bordering on speedy delete as spam. Resolute 02:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete What next? A web poll to find the most influential celebrity? Xiner (talk, email) 04:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, non-scientific website with totally subjective content. HagenUK 19:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom ↔NMajdan &bull;talk 20:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Crystallina. Completely absurd; I don't think this the results of this poll are ever going to be very "infuential"... DWaterson 23:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.